sue employer for negligence featured image

Can I Sue My Employer for Negligence

Legal AssistantPersonal Injury Law, Resources Leave a Comment

The relationship between an employer and their employee can be hugely beneficial to both parties. However, it is also a delicate balancing act in the event things go wrong. The law also recognizes this unique relationship and works to protect the interests of both parties to ensure that all their legal rights are protected.

So what happens if you suffer an injury at work? Can you sue your employer for negligence? Well, the answer to this isn’t as straightforward as you might think. Here’s everything you need to know about seeking legal redress for work-related injuries.

Can I Sue My Employer for Negligence

Under the workers’ compensation system, the short answer to this question is – no. You cannot sue your employer for negligence unless they intentionally did something to physically harm you. Most states in the US have adopted this system which is designed to cater exclusively to compensating employees who get injured in their line of work.

It is defined in the law as an “exclusive remedy,” which means that it is the only compensation that an individual can claim in such circumstances. As a result, since the employee gets reparation in this way, they essentially forfeit their right to sue their employer for additional damages. The rationale behind this is that if workers can receive compensation for injuries swiftly and efficiently, it saves tax-paying companies the time, hassle and expense of fighting lawsuits.

Employers pay insurance for benefits and all other injury-related costs for employees who get hurt in their line of work. It doesn’t matter who is to blame. Therefore, if an employee got hurt due to their negligent actions or if they were injured at work due to employer negligence, there isn’t any fault requirement for the benefits to be paid out. This system works for several reasons.

injured arm image

For starters, an employee doesn’t have to sue their employer every single time they get injured at work. Moreover, if the employee were to sue, the burden of proof would rest squarely on their shoulders. This means that they would have to prove that their employer was negligent as a result of which the employee sustained workplace injuries. This litigation process would likely take months or even years before they could receive work injury lawsuit settlements.

Workers’ Compensation 101: The Basics

While workers’ compensation is certainly a remarkable system, employees are required to adhere to the company rules and regulations. If an accident occurs while the worker was engaged in behavior that is a clear violation of the company’s rules and regulations, they might not receive compensation. Here’s an illustration.

Suppose you’re a warehouse worker, and part of the company rules stipulate that you’re required to wear steel-toed boots to protect your feet from harm in case a heavy object fell on them. One day, you decide to go into the warehouse wearing your favorite open-toe sandals and on that particular day, a cast iron plate happens to fall on your toes causing a hairline fracture. In such an instance, you may not be eligible for workers’ compensation.

When You Can Sue Your Employer for Negligence

While the whole premise behind workers’ compensation is to avoid litigation altogether, there are extraneous circumstances where employees can sue their employer for negligence. These are detailed below.

1. Your Employer Doesn’t Have Workers’ Compensation Insurance

All employers are legally required to provide workers’ compensation insurance to all their employees. However, just because it’s in the law, doesn’t mean that all companies comply. Some states even have an opt-out option where the company isn’t obligated to maintain workers’ comp.

compensation money image

If you happened to get injured while working in such a company, then you can get the best work injury lawyers to help you sue for damages. In such instances, the employer isn’t protected by workers’ compensation lawsuit protection, leaving them with no choice but to litigate if they’re sued.

2. You’re Not Technically a Company “Employee”

working on construction site image

Depending on the terms of your employment contract, as well as the state you live in, some categories of professionals are not considered to be “employees” of the company per se. For instance, many companies don’t regard real-estate brokers and the commission-only sales force as employees and are therefore excluded from the workers’ compensation cover. If you’re one of these individuals and you got injured while performing your professional duties, a work injury law firm can help you establish whether or not your employer has a case to answer for.

3. Your Employer Intentionally Hurt You

Workers’ compensation applies specifically to workplace injuries that result from accidents. If you and your employer got into a heated altercation and they inflicted injuries on you; as a result, you have the right to pursue a civil suit against them.

Returning to Work After an Injury

After suffering a work-related injury, you might not feel ready to go back, especially if your injuries were severe. Unfortunately, once your doctor gives you a clean bill of health, you have no choice but to return to work or else risk losing your workers’ comp benefits. If you’re forced back to work after an injury before reaching the maximum medical improvement threshold, you might need to hire an attorney to help you navigate through the process.

In other instances, your employer may not have your old job available for you when you return to work and may not have another position available for you in the company, especially if you have medical restrictions. Talking to an experienced attorney to explore your available options may be the only way to get the justice you deserve.

Get an Experienced Work Injury Attorney to Help

Workers’ compensation can be a double-edged sword of sorts. In some cases, it gives with one hand while taking with the other. If you suffer a work-related injury and feel like you’re getting the short end of the stick, consult a work injury lawyer who can help you explore the best way to pursue and safeguard your legal rights.

You can get an idea of how much your case may be worth with this online case evaluation form offered by the Lawsuit Info Center.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat now with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.

personal injury case featured image

Do I Have a Personal Injury Case?

Legal AssistantPersonal Injury Law Leave a Comment

Accidents happen all the time – that’s why they are called accidents. In the US, an estimated 2.7 million people sustain injuries in road-related accidents every year. It is entirely likely that the majority of them resulted in personal injury cases to hold the liable parties accountable for their role in the mishap.

However, these are not the only kind of injury claims that exist. Any incident that results in one of the parties suffering some sort of pain, suffering, or a notable change in their quality of life all counts as a personal injury claim.

Determining whether or not you have a case that you can pursue can be quite confusing, and the whole process can be daunting. However, it’s important to take the necessary steps to safeguard your legal rights if you feel that your injuries were the result of someone else’s negligence.

Do I Have a Personal Injury Case?

To determine whether you have a case, you first need to understand what constitutes a personal injury lawsuit in the first place. Put simply, this type of legal dispute arises when one party suffers injury or harm from an accident in which another party bears some level of responsibility for causing it.

In such instances, the responsible party’s insurance is required to offer monetary compensation to the injured party. This is supposed to go towards footing medical bills or any other ongoing medical expenses.

It also goes towards compensating the victim for the pain and suffering they’ve endured during the whole ordeal. If you’ve sustained harm or injury and are wondering whether you have a personal injury case, here are three basic criteria you can use to tell.

1. Negligence

Suppose you are driving about town running a couple of errands, bobbing your head to your favorite tune… essentially minding your own business before stopping at a red light. Suddenly a loud bang startles you, and you realize that a truck driver has just rear-ended you!

You unbuckle your seatbelt, open the door, and step out of your car to inspect the damage. You find your rear bumper on the ground, surrounded by shuttered taillights and a conspicuous dent on the trunk of your car.

traffic cone image

In such a scenario, the truck driver was careless since they failed to brake at an appropriate distance behind the car ahead. In the eyes of the law, their actions would be considered negligent, and they would be deemed responsible for the accident.

3. Negligence Caused Personal Injury

Continuing with the same illustration above, as you’re inspecting the damage, you begin to feel a sharp pain in your neck as a result of the severe jerk to your head following the impact. As a result, you then begin to experience frequent severe headaches that you never had before the crash and which don’t seem to be getting any better with the medication your doctor provides.

You further learn that the truck driver happened to be in a heated exchange with someone on their phone moments before the impact, so they didn’t even notice that:

a. The traffic lights were red, and

b. There was a car ahead of them

You can deduct from this scenario that the driver’s negligence caused the whiplash and the frequent headaches that you now have to live with.

3. Compensatory Damages

In keeping with narrative, suppose that you now have to take the next two weeks off work to recover from your injuries. Given the nature of your contract with your employer, time away from work results in you receiving 50% of what would be your daily wages for the duration you’re away.

If that’s not enough, you find out that your insurance policy doesn’t even cover a significant portion of the medical bills from your frequent doctor visits to treat your recurring headaches. So, you’re forced to foot the bills out-of-pocket.

Moreover, having to deal with this entire situation in addition to your headaches has caused you untold stress, anxiety, pain, and suffering. In such an instance, the truck driver owes you some sort of monetary compensation to help you deal with the challenges of your new reality.

What Type of Lawyer Do I Need?

There are different types of personal injury lawyers whose specialty lies in dealing with specific types of injury claims. You want to find an attorney with a proven track record of dealing with and winning your specific type of claim.

traffic lights image

Personal Injury Attorneys

A personal injury lawyer is a type of civil litigation lawyer whose specialty lies in providing legal representation to plaintiffs who allege physical and psychological harm or injury due to the negligent actions of another person or entity.

Personal injury law is an umbrella term that encompasses a host of different types of cases. It involves any of the following claims:

  • Brain injuries
  • Construction accidents
  • Motor vehicle accidents
  • Medical malpractice
  • Slip and fall accidents
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Aviation accidents
  • Bicycle accidents
  • Boating accidents
  • Wrongful death

The type of lawyer you’ll need ultimately depends on the specific nature of the personal injury claim. They will handle your case from inception all the way to appeal. Here are some of the most common types of lawyers you’ll find.

Motor Vehicle / Car Accident Lawyers

If you sustained harm or injury in a motor vehicle accident as a driver, passenger, or pedestrian, you’d need to get in touch with a car accident attorney. They specialize in going after monetary compensation if you are the aggrieved party. They can also defend your rights if you are the accused party.

car crash accident image

These types of lawsuits are one of the most difficult claims to litigate since you not only have to prove that the other party is entirely liable for your injuries, but you may also face huge obstacles when it comes to the settlement of your claim, especially if it exceeds the policy limits. For this reason, you must get a sterling, well-reputed attorney who is well-versed in handling these types of claims.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys

Doctors and other medical practitioners truly go above and beyond to care for and treat their patients. They work under immense pressure but still do their level best under their present circumstances to ensure that no harm comes to their patients while they are under their care.

Nevertheless, to be human is to err, and despite their best efforts, even the most astute doctor can make mistakes. Medical malpractice cases come in various forms. Some of these include:

  • Failure to properly diagnose an ailment
  • Failure to properly treat an ailment
  • Pursuing a treatment course (against their better judgment) that is likely to harm the patient
  • Pursuing a treatment course that contravenes the existing standards of care
  • Performing the wrong procedure on a patient like amputating the wrong limb
  • Exposing the patient to harmful elements like allergens
  • Giving a patient the wrong dose of a potentially harmful drug

One of the basic requirements for a medical malpractice claim is that the aggrieved party has not only to prove that they were injured as a result of the doctor’s actions, but that there was also a better treatment option available.

You must prove that the doctor in question went against the prescribed standard of care. This is often difficult to do, so you need to retain the services of the best medical malpractice lawyers if you hope to make any headway with your lawsuit.

Personal Injury vs. Medical Malpractice

If you’ve come across these two legal terms, you’re most likely wondering how personal injury cases differ from medical malpractice cases. Well, in theory, they both mean the same thing, that is, an individual suffers harm or injury through no fault of their own and seeking monetary compensation as a result.

refilling tubes image

The difference between them becomes apparent when you consider the scope of each. Personal injury claims cover all sorts of harm inflicted by other parties. They could involve anything from a slip and fall to a dog bite incident.

Medical malpractice is classified as a branch of personal injury law but is more specific as it deals with the negligence of medical care professionals. Here’s what makes the two distinct.

Complexity

A personal injury claim is more straightforward. It is usually doesn’t involve a complex litigation process to establish whether the accused party is responsible for the loss or injury. For instance, if you fell outside a storefront that had a wet or slippery floor, it is the store owner’s responsibility to safeguard the wellbeing of passers-by.

They could have done this by cordoning off the wet area to ensure that no accidents happen. They could have also taken the initiative to change the tiles or install non-slip mats if the floor is slippery.

They could have also put a sign up to warn the public of the slippery floor so that they can take the necessary precautions to prevent an unprecedented fall. If the store owner did none of these, then you have a right to seek compensatory damages if you slip and fall.

A medical malpractice suit, on the other hand, requires every minuscule detail to be analyzed with a magnifying glass and a fine-tooth comb. The sheer volume of details that have to be analyzed in these types of lawsuits are excessive compared to other personal injury claims.

Lawyers who deal with medical malpractice suits also have to be well-versed in medical facts, terminology, jargon, and standard operating procedures to successfully prove liability on the part of the medical practitioner.

Admission of Fault

The success rate of all injury suits is inherently lower compared to that of medical malpractice suits. The reason for this all goes back to the straightforwardness of it all. The process is also a lot easier when there is an admission of fault, which happens more often than you might think.

Unfortunately, in medical malpractice cases, doctors are heavily backed by their insurance company and the hospital they work for, so they deny any liability right up to the very end.

Workers’ Compensation Lawyers

Workers’ compensation refers to a system where company employees receive compensatory damages for harm or injuries they sustain while on duty. Here’s how personal injury cases differ from workers’ compensation cases. It has everything to do with fault.

Workers’ comp seeks to pay employees for medical and rehabilitation costs, as well as lost wages without due regard for their fault or negligence. However, due to this “no-fault” system, employees, therefore, forfeit their right to sue their employers directly for other damages or negligence.

In personal injury cases, however, “fault” is a requirement. Perhaps the biggest difference between workers’ compensation cases and personal injury lawsuits is that in the latter, the aggrieved party is entitled to pain and suffering damages. The same can’t be said for workers’ comp.

So, the defining factor that determines whether you have a personal injury or workers’ compensation case has to do with where the injury occurred. If you sustained injuries at work, a competent workers’ compensation attorney could help you get the damages you’re entitled to.

Compensatory Damages in Personal Injury Cases

Once you establish that you have a legal basis on which to seek compensation, what kind of damages can you claim in your lawsuit? The most common ones you can sue for include:

  • Cost of medical bills
  • Loss of income
  • Loss of property
  • Pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress
  • Loss of consortium
  • Loss of enjoyment
  • Punitive damages

The whole premise behind suing for compensation is to try to put a dollar amount on the consequences you have suffered as a result of an accident or incident. The idea is to try to make you “whole” again.

When in Doubt – Consult

Once you’ve established that you have a personal injury case, that’s only part of the battle won. Whether or not you have a strong case is an entirely different discussion. It helps to consult with an experienced attorney to help you explore all the options available to you to figure out whether your claim is worth pursuing.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat now with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.

small claims court featured image

Small Claims Court: When You Should and Shouldn’t File

Legal AssistantResources Leave a Comment

Almost everyone has been in this catch-22 situation: You’re involved in some dispute about money. You want to recover it. Talking to the other party about it yields no results.

You want to pursue the matter through the court system, but when you consider the time and money it will take to retain a lawyer, you realize that it’s all a zero-sum game. So, what’s the way forward? Do you just let the whole matter slide? Well, you don’t have to.

Small claims court exists for just this purpose. Here’s everything you need to know about the process of filing a suit in small claims court.

What Is Small Claims Court

Small claims court is exactly what it sounds like. It’s a court system set up to resolve “small claims.” It exists for aggrieved parties to seek legal recourse and recover damages that are worth relatively small amounts of money. These courts exist to resolve disputes with a small claims court limit that typically ranges between $1,000 and $7,500.

The exact figure, however, varies from state to state. The beauty of it all is that you don’t need to have attorney representation. While it certainly helps to have a small claims lawyer to increase your chances of getting a favorable outcome, it’s not necessary. Simply prepare well, present your case and evidence to the presiding judge, magistrate or special appointee, and wait for the ruling.

It is more relaxed than other regular courts as you don’t have to follow all the rules of procedure and evidence which attorneys are expected to follow. And, let’s face it – you may not even be aware of what they are in the first place!

The premise behind the creation of the small claims court system is to unclog the legal system by swiftly moving through cases that involve small disputes between two parties in a relatively inexpensive manner.

How Does Small Claims Court Work

First, you need to understand when you should and shouldn’t file a claim in small claims court. For instance, regardless of the state you live in, you cannot use small claims court to file for bankruptcy, divorce, name change, or guardianship.

You also can’t use this system to seek emergency relief like an injunction to block an individual from carrying out an illegal act. Additionally, you cannot file a lawsuit against the federal government, a federal agency, or federal employees for actions related to their employment in small claims court.

Federal cases have to be filed in federal courts like the Tax Court or the Court of Claims. However, the Tax Court does have procedures for small claims. Here are some common claims you can resolve in small claims court.

Bad Debt

debt

This is a type of contract case. To successfully pursue this type of claim, you first need to prove the existence of the debt, the date the payment was due, the amount, and that the person you’re suing has only paid it partially or not paid it at all.

Breach of Contract

You have to prove that the party you are suing has broken one or more terms of an agreement that was in place, causing you to suffer a monetary loss. A valid agreement (or contract) can be implied, oral or written.

Breach of Warranty

A warranty refers to an assurance extended to you by a merchant. To pursue this type of claim, you have to show that the merchant has breached the warranty and you have suffered monetary loss as a result. For instance, a new car you purchased suffers mechanical problems while still under a valid warranty.

Failure to Return a Security Deposit

This is one of the most common small claims court cases that arise between tenants and landlords. To file this suit, you need to prove that you paid a security deposit to your landlord and that it was partially refunded or not refunded at all. You also need to prove that you left the premises in clean and undamaged conditions and as such, the landlord owes you the full amount they’re withholding.

Defamation

To pursue a defamation suit in small claims court, you need to prove that the accused party said or wrote something about you or your business that was untrue and that it damaged your reputation as a result. Some states ban this kind of suits since more often than not untrue statements usually don’t result in devastating damage.

reviewing contract image

Personal Injury

You have to prove that the negligent actions of the accused party caused you to suffer a personal injury.

Property Damage

You have to prove that the negligent actions of the accused party caused damage to your personal property.

Product Liability

You need to prove that you suffered injuries as a result of a defective product. The manufacturer would be the defendant in the suit.

How to File in Small Claims Court

Filing a lawsuit against the accused party is a straightforward process. Remember, you go to small claims court when all attempts to resolve the issue with the other party have failed. The steps for filing a claim in small claims court are as follows:

  1. Document the steps you’ve taken to settle the issue. Ensure you send a demand letter via a suitable delivery system.
  2. Determine whether the court has jurisdiction to hear your case.
  3. Visit the court in question to get the forms you need, or download them online.
  4. Pay the small claims court costs. These are recoverable if you win.
  5. Calculate the value of your exact damages. Ensure that the amount in question meets the maximum and minimum threshold in your jurisdiction.
  6. File your claim within the time limit specified in your state’s statute of limitations.
  7. Gather all your evidence and prepare to present it to the judge on the court-appointed date.

Before you even file, you need to determine the likelihood of getting any money from the other party. If you’re dealing with a business, the chances are much better than if you’re dealing with an individual. Weigh your options before you decide to file.

property damage image

Preparation Is Everything

Representing yourself in court is undoubtedly an intimidating process. However, if you gather the correct information, evidence, and anything else that is deemed necessary to strengthen your case, you’ll likely get the outcome you desire. Be sure to do your research first and, if you can afford it, let a lawyer handle it for you.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat now with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.

texas sexual harassment laws featured image

Texas Sexual Harassment Laws

Legal AssistantCriminal Law, Personal Injury Law, Resources Leave a Comment

Sexual harassment on college campuses and in the workplace is against the law both in the State of Texas and at the federal level. Federal level sexual harassment law considers it a form of gender discrimination.

During the 2019 legislative session, new sexual harassment laws were passed in Texas aimed at beefing up protection against unwanted sexual advances. Here’s everything you need to know about Texas sexual harassment laws.

What Is Sexual Harassment

Sexual harassment is characterized by unwelcome sexual advances of a physical or verbal nature, which are intended to solicit sexual favors. According to a 2016 report by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), an estimated 75% of employees who are sexually harassed at work fail to report the matter to a supervisor, manager or union representative. The main reason for this is that victims are afraid of experiencing workplace retaliation from their employers.

If you experience a pattern of unwelcome sexually suggestive actions or remarks, then you have grounds to sue the offending party for sexual harassment. The law also protects employees from facing relation against them when they launch a sexual harassment complaint against their employer. Even though Texas follows the “at-will” employment doctrine, employers are prohibited from suspending, demoting, hiring, or firing an employee who launches a sexual harassment complaint against them.

violence against women image

Modern-day harassment is a lot different from what it was in the last two decades or so. It often takes on more subtle forms as opposed to the stereotypical slap on the derriere or direct proposition for sex. These days, you might receive suggestive text messages late at night or inappropriate images from a coworker.

You might find sexually offensive comments on your social media profiles, emails, or other settings outside the formal workspace. You might even get an invitation to what starts as an official meeting that somehow ends up becoming a date. All these constitute sexual harassment and it is well within your rights to object to them and seek legal redress.

Types of Sexual Harassment

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act outlaws two types of sexual harassment. The first is quid pro quo harassment, which happens when a supervisor or someone in a position of authority requests for sexual favors or conduct in exchange for tangible results.

For instance, your supervisor might proposition you to sleep with them in exchange for a promotion at work. Your college professor may proposition you for sex in exchange for better grades.

The second type of sexual harassment is referred to as a hostile work environment. This occurs when an employee is subjected to unsolicited physical or verbal sexual advances that are so severe – it alters the employee’s working environment making it hostile and abusive.

For instance, every time your boss summons you into their office, it always leads to them propositioning you for sex. Or, every time you’re alone with them, they make a sexual pass at you.

While assertions of quid pro quo harassment may be easier to prove, the same can’t be said for hostile work environment allegations. The latter is harder to detect and even more difficult to prove. However, this should not deter you from reporting sexual harassment incidences.

Types of Inappropriate Sexual Conduct in the Workplace

Some forms of sexual harassment are clear as day. For instance, unwanted kissing, touching of intimate areas, requests for sexual favors, etc. all stand out as sexual harassment.

tension at workplace image

However, it isn’t always as overt. Here are a few examples of subtle sexual conduct that can be characterized as sexual harassment.

  • Repeated compliments about an employee’s appearance
  • An employer discussing their sex life in front of an employee
  • Asking an employee about their sex life
  • Making sexual jokes
  • Circulating nude or semi-nude photos in the workplace
  • Spreading sexual rumors about a coworker
  • Leaving unwanted gifts of a romantic or sexual nature
  • Unwanted physical contact such as a hand on an employee’s back
  • Commenting on the attractiveness of other coworkers in front of an employee

For all these to qualify as a hostile work environment, the behavior must be offensive to the employee and any other reasonable person if they were in the same circumstances. It always helps to speak to the best harassment lawyers if you’re unsure.

At What Point Is Sexual Harassment a Crime

Under Texas State law, perpetrators of sexual harassment may be charged with harassment or assault. In particularly severe cases, offenders may be charged with sexual assault.

Each of these charges carries with it heavy fines and possible jail time. Criminal harassment is a Class B misdemeanor under Texas Penal Code that carries a fine of up to $2,000, a 6-month jail term, or both.

Assault is a Class C misdemeanor that carries a fine of up to $500 or $2,000 if the victim experiences “pain” or a 1-year jail term. Lastly, sexual assault is considered a second-degree felony and carries with it up to $10,000 in fines or a jail term of up to 20 years.

In most cases, however, sexual harassment is usually handled as a civil matter in civil court. It may also be handled administratively through filing a complaint at agencies like the Texas Workforce Commission – Civil Rights Division or the EEOC. Lawyers for harassment and discrimination exist for just this purpose and will advise you on the best course of action to take.

New Laws in Texas 2020 on Sexual Harassment

Previously sexual harassment laws detailed unwanted behavior in the workplace. Now, with the new Senate Bill 212 that goes into effect on January 1, 2020, employees of public, private or independent institutions of higher learning are required to report all incidences of dating violence, sexual assault, harassment or stalking against an employee or student to the Title IX coordinator.

sexual assault image

If the employee fails to report the incident, they will be charged with a Class B misdemeanor or a Class A misdemeanor if the conceal the incident. The law also protects these employees from workplace retaliation when they make the reports.

Take Back Your Power

Dealing with sexual harassment at work can make it quite difficult for a victim to think clearly about the best way to respond. This is often because they are afraid of losing their job or getting stigmatized for reporting the harassment.

However, this fear is often due to a lack of information. The law protects you against any form of retaliation. Consult a harassment lawyer to find out the formal measures you can take to protect yourself.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat now with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.

2020 california privacy law featured image

What You Need to Know About the 2020 California Privacy Law

Legal AssistantBusiness Law, Resources 1 Comment

Before diving into the California, Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) here’s an interesting tidbit for you. Did you know that the human brain receives and processes 400 billion bits of information every second? That’s 50 gigabytes of information in just one second.

For context, think about how much information you would need to store to fill up a 50GB hard disk. Now consider doing that in one second? It’s pretty amazing, right? In the same way, people also generate copious amounts of data that give insight into what makes them tick.

Businesses leverage this information to customize their consumers’ experience and increase their bottom line. It is virtually impossible to come across a business that doesn’t collect information on their consumers.

Remember Facebook’s 2018 user-accounts breaches? Well, they made the news again in 2019 after hundreds of millions of user records were leaked on Amazon cloud servers. But where do businesses draw the line? Are you even aware of the amount of data about you that’s out there, who has access to it, and how it is used?

The California Consumer Privacy Act seeks to change all that. Here’s what you need to know about it.

What Is the 2020 California Privacy Law – CCPA Overview

On June 28, 2018, California Governor Jerry Brown passed the first major data privacy law in the United States. It gives California state residents the right to:

  • Know what personal information businesses and other entities are collecting about them
  • Know why their personal information is being collected
  • Know whether or not their personal information is disclosed or sold to third parties
  • If their personal information is disclosed or sold, know the identity of the third parties receiving the information
  • Request their data to be deleted
  • Opt-out of the sale of their personal information
  • Initiate civil action against an organization if they believe it failed to protect their data
external hdd image

The CCPA was introduced and passed in a record time of one week merely hours before the 2017-2018 legislative session drew to a close. This was incredibly fast for a law that would have such widespread implications.

While the law will go into effect on January 1, 2020, enforcement begins on July 1, 2020. The CCPA law has been labeled a landmark policy as it will see California implement the strongest privacy controls any state in the US has ever seen.

Do the CCPA Regulations Apply to Your Business

If you have a company, you first need to assess whether the new law applies to your business and its business partners. The term “business” refers to any legal entity whose structure and operation are for the profit or financial gain of its owners. CCPA compliance is mandatory if your business meets the following criteria:

  • Your business operates in California
  • It collects personal consumer data
  • Your business has annual gross revenues that exceed $25 million
  • It buys, receives, shares or sells personal information belonging to 50,000 or more consumers, devices or households yearly
  • Decides how and why consumers’ data will be processed
  • 50 percent or more of its annual revenues come from selling consumers’ data

Any entity that meets the above criteria has to comply with the new law regardless of its geographic location if part of your business is in California or has Californian consumers. The exception only applies if all a business’ operations and dealings take place wholly outside of the state. This applies when:

  • The consumer was outside of California when their information was collected
  • The sale of the consumer’s personal information did not occur in California
  • The sale of the consumer’s personal information did not occur while they were in California

The law will impact more than 500,000 US companies, the majority of which are small-to medium-sized enterprises and applies to business-to-business (B2B) as well as business-to-consumer (B2C) companies.

CCPA Definition of “Consumer” and “Personal Information”

The term “consumer” as used in the new law refers to California residents. It is further defined in the law as:

  • Any individual in the state who isn’t on transit or residing there temporarily
  • Any individual who is a California state resident but is on transit or is temporarily living in another state

Additionally, the CCPA definition of “personal information” borrows from the one applied under California Data Breach Notification Law. It refers to an individual’s first name or initials, or their last name combined with the following elements that are neither redacted nor encrypted:

  • Their social security number
  • Their Californian identification card number
  • Their driver’s license number
  • Their health insurance information
  • Their medical information
  • Account number, debit or credit card number alongside any password, security or access code that would authorize access to their financial account
data has a better idea image

The law also defines “personally identifiable information” (PII), as information that can identify, describe, relate to, be reasonably linked with, and be associated with a particular individual or household. It includes:

  • Commercial information like purchasing history or records of personal property
  • Biometric information
  • Education information
  • Professional/employment information
  • Aliases
  • Internet activity
  • IP addresses
  • Geolocation data
  • Audio, visual, electronic, olfactory or thermal information
  • All characteristics of protected categories under federal or California State law

In the event of a single, one-time transaction where the data collected is not re-identified or sold, the CCPA may not apply in such instances. It also doesn’t apply to the use of pseudo names in place of actual consumer ID or de-identifying personal information required for internal analytical purposes or research.

Implementation of the CCPA

The California State Attorney General will be charged with enforcing the CCPA. There are two principal types of enforcement actions that can be taken:

  • Section 17206 of the California Business and Professions Code states that the Attorney General can take legal action against a non-compliant business
  • If a data breach involving unredacted or unencrypted personal data occurs, a consumer is granted the CCPA private right of action and statutory damages

Private right of action in this context means that affected individuals or entities are permitted to file a suit or class action if their redacted or encrypted data was subjected to unauthorized access. The CCPA fines for noncompliance are also addressed. Businesses that intentionally violate the law are given 30 days to resolve the issues and are fined $7,500 for each violation.

On the other hand, businesses that unintentionally violate the law and fail to resolve the issues within 30 days are required to pay a penalty of $2,500 per violation. 20% of the cumulative fines are channeled towards a Consumer Privacy Fund that will be set up.

How Businesses Can Comply With CCPA

The CCPA compliance checklist for businesses includes disclosure requirements for collecting and selling consumer data.

business newspaper image

1. Data Collection Disclosure Checklist

Any business that is collecting consumer data has to comply with the following requirements by January 1, 2020:

  • Disclose to consumers which categories of personal information will be collected
  • Disclose to consumers the purposes for which the different categories of collected personal information will be used
  • After the initial disclosures, consumers must be given notice of any additional categories of information that will be collected as well as their respective purposes
  • Disclose to consumers their rights to request deletion of their personal information
  • Disclose to consumers the limitations to their rights to request for deletion of their personal information

2. Data Sale Disclosure Checklist

Any business that sells or intends to sell consumer data has to comply with the following requirements by January 1, 2020:

  • Disclose to consumers that their information may be sold
  • Disclose to consumers that they have the right to opt-out of the sale of their personal information
  • Disclose to consumers which categories of their personal information it has sold in the last 12 months
  • Disclose to consumers if no sale of their information has occurred in the last 12 months
  • Disclose to consumers which categories of their personal information have been shared or sold for a business purpose in the last 12 months
  • Include a clear and conspicuous link on the business website homepage stating “Do Not Sell My Personal Information”
  • Provide the above link to any consumer visiting the website without requiring them to create an account on the site
  • Describe the consumer’s rights on the website to not face any form of discrimination if they opt-out of the sale of their data
  • Describe a consumer’s rights as detailed under Section 1798.120 as well as an additional link to the “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” page
  • The “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” page should be maintained in the website’s online privacy policy/policies or any description of consumer privacy rights that are specific to California
  • Clearly and conspicuously provide one or more ways through which consumers can submit requests regarding the handling of their personal information
  • Acquire an explicit opt-in confirmation from a parent/guardian to sell children’s data if the child is below the age of 13 or from the child themselves if they are between the ages of 13 and 16 years
checklist

GDPR vs. CCPA – Are They Similar

The CCPA has been widely regarded as being similar to the EU’s GDPR. But, what is GDPR anyway? GDPR stands for General Data Protection Regulation, which went into effect on May 25, 2018. It is designed to protect citizens of the EU and applies to any company globally that collects, sells, or stores the personal information of EU citizens.

Many people are quick in drawing comparisons between the two laws. However, the scope of the CCPA isn’t nearly as wide as that of the GDPR. If you own a US-based business and believe that GDPR compliance automatically makes it CCPA-compliant, you’re wrong. Here are some notable differences between the two acts.

  • The CCPA requires full disclosure to consumers as well as transparent communication channels. This isn’t the case with GDPR.
  • The CCPA definition of “personal data” extends beyond that of individuals to include data on households and devices. The GDPR definition isn’t as encompassing.
  • The CCPA gives California state residents more rights with regards to access to their data as well as its deletion. The same can’t be said for the GDPR.
  • The CCPA is more restrictive when it comes to data sharing for commercial purposes. The GDPR doesn’t have quite as many constraints.
  • The CCPA makes it harder for companies to offer free or premium services based on whether or not the consumer provides their explicit consent to the monetization of their personal information.
  • The GDPR requires privacy awareness training to be provided to the general public. This isn’t the case for the CCPA.

Why Is the California Privacy Law Important

The CCPA provides a solution to the long-standing “trust crisis” that plagues the digital realm and consumers. Your data belongs to you. This means that you have the right to dictate how and where (if at all) it is used. Here’s why the CCPA is important to consumers:

  • The infamous Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal brought to light just how little control consumers have over their data. This law is the first step towards returning control of user data into the hands of users themselves.
  • California is home to Silicon Valley – the world-renowned birthplace of technological innovation. The task of fighting tech giants in the state has been a losing battle, until now. The fact that the CCPA became law so quickly speaks volumes of the widespread support legislators received from their constituents to protect their privacy rights.
  • California has always spearheaded privacy legislation. The CCPA now paves the way for other states to follow suit and perhaps even enact a national privacy Act to protect all US citizens.

Consumer Privacy Game-Changer

Data collected by online companies is a goldmine for highly-targeted advertising and marketing efforts by third parties. It gives businesses and other entities insight into their consumers to predict their behavior and modify their messaging.

But, the issue of user data collection takes on a whole new dimension when it is sold, abused, or stolen. It is a gross violation of privacy that users have no control over. The 2020 California Privacy Law changes all that – for California State residents anyway.

It returns the power to the people, and they now have a bigger say on what personal information companies collect, how it is used and gives them the chance to opt-out of providing their data if they don’t want to. The law is a game-changer and will hopefully trigger other states to follow suit.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat now with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.

california assembly bill 5 (ab5) featured image

Why California Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) Affects Everyone

Legal AssistantBusiness Law, Resources Leave a Comment

If you are a gig worker, then you know all too well the void you feel when you’re “in-between” gigs and the exhilaration that follows when you land your next assignment. It’s almost like being on a trapeze, but without the safety net below.

But, despite its ups and downs, you wouldn’t trade it in for a corporate nine to five job. The gig economy makes up roughly 40% of American workers and is a fast-growing segment with more and more corporates embracing the crowd-sourcing culture as it were.

However, if you’re an independent contractor, project-based worker, freelancer, part-time worker, or temporary hire in California, how does the AB5 Bill affect you? Can you get the best of both worlds? If you own a business whose foundation is built on independent on-demand labor, what does the future hold for you? Here’s why California Assembly Bill 5 affects everyone.

What Is AB5

The California Assembly Bill 5 or AB5 for short is a controversial piece of legislation that was signed into law on September 18, 2019, by California Governor Gavin Newsom. It effectively reclassifies independent contractors as employees reshaping the future of gig workers in California and potentially other states if they decide to follow suit.

Additionally, because of the way it is written, its effects extend to companies that aren’t based in California but contract independent contractors from the state. This includes those who cross into California even temporarily.

Before the herculean task of restructuring the entire Californian workforce sets in, the Supreme Court ruled that the “ABC Test” has to be used to classify workers in wage-order claims. The whole premise behind the ABC Test is to lay the burden of proof squarely on the shoulders of the hiring company to show that an employee is an independent contractor.

For a company to do this, it has to satisfy all three criteria of the ABC test. That is, a worker is classified as an independent contractor if:

A. The worker is free from any form of direction or control in the performance or delivery of their services

B. The worker performs their duties, assignments, projects or tasks outside the usual scope of business the hiring company

C. The worker is customarily contracted in an independently established business, occupation, or trade whose nature of work is similar to that of the hiring company

The scope of these new California laws 2020 definitions of an independent contractor is a lot more restrictive than the Borello test, which was the standard previously adopted in the state.

It made it much easier to classify workers as independent contractors. The ABC Test is now embedded into law and extends beyond wage-order claims to all the state Labor and Unemployment Insurance provisions.

Enforcement of AB5

How AB5 will be enforced is the ultimate billion-dollar question. As is the case with all new laws that have no set precedent in the judicial system, there will likely be a significant gap between what is provided for in law and how the courts interpret it.

As it currently stands, a vast majority of state agencies oversee worker classification only when it pertains to wage-order claims made by individuals. But, this could be the gateway to larger agency audits into hiring companies’ worker classification. Such audits will likely use the ABC Test to determine what constitutes “improper” classification.

The law gives the California State Attorney General, local prosecutors, and city lawyers the leeway to file lawsuits against companies that violate this law. This will likely trigger long-drawn-out legal battles with companies that can afford to flex their financial muscles as they work hard to fight orders requiring them to reclassify their workers.

The litmus test, however, has everything to do with how the courts interpret AB5, and so far, the California Supreme Court is yet to apply the ABC Test in any single case that has been presented to them. So, as it stands, interpretation of that law remains in limbo. It is, however, entirely possible that the courts will interpret the AB5 law in such a way that some companies are allowed to classify workers as independent contractors.

AB5 Exemptions

Before the bill was signed into law, AB5 was the subject of major lobbying efforts from interest groups who sat on opposite sides of the fence. The result? More than four dozen different types of businesses and professions that managed to exempt themselves from this law.

They include insurance agents, dentists, doctors, accountants, lawyers, hairstylists, real estate agents, and various creative professionals. In addition to this, the law also exempts referral agencies that meet 10 very specific requirements, as well as business-to-business (B2B) contractors that meet a list of 12 very specific requirements.

Referral Agencies

referral system image

For referral agencies to be classified as independent contractors, they need to:

  • Be free from the hiring firm’s direction and control while providing their services
  • Have all required business tax registration documentation and licenses
  • Have the required State Contractor’s License if the nature of work of the client requires it
  • Deliver services to the client under their (service provider’s) name rather than that of the referral agency
  • Provide their vehicles, equipment and any other tools required to deliver their services
  • Be customarily contracted in an independently established business, occupation, or trade that is similar to the work performed for the client
  • Contract with other clients to provide similar services and maintain clientele without any restrictions from the referral agency
  • Set their terms of engagement, working schedule and can accept/reject clients and contracts
  • Set their rates without any deduction from the referral agency
  • Not be penalized for rejecting clients and contracts

B2C Contractors

For B2B service providers to be classified as independent contractors, they need to:

  • Be free from the hiring firm’s direction and control while providing their services
  • Provide services directly to the hiring firm rather than its customers
  • Have a written contract
  • Have all required business tax registration documentation and licenses
  • Maintain a separate business location from that of the hiring firm
  • Be customarily contracted in an independently established business, occupation, or trade that is similar to the work performed for the hiring firm
  • Contract with other businesses to provide similar services and maintain clientele without any restrictions from the hiring firm
  • Advertise and promote themselves out to the public as available to provide similar services
  • Provide their vehicles, equipment and any other tools required to deliver their services
  • Negotiate their rates
  • Be consistent with the nature of the services provided, set their hours and work from any location of their choosing
  • Not provide services for which a license from the Contractors State License Board is mandatory

What Does AB5 Mean for Everyone

As it currently stands, workers who are classified as independent contractors don’t enjoy the protections offered by the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Civil Rights Act, or the Americans with Disabilities Act. They’re also not entitled to the rights afforded to employees like overtime pay, minimum wage or even unemployment insurance.

The enactment of the AB5 law is a big win for independent workers. However, for tech companies whose core business model is built around contracted on-demand workers, the AB5 law means that they have to relook, restructure and reorganize their operating models, a process they claim will cost billions of dollars to do. They’ve threatened to pass these costs to consumers, so expect to pay higher rates for tech services like ride-sharing, food delivery, etc.

Critics of the legislation also warn independent contractors who are accustomed to the freedom and flexibility their work affords them, that reclassification to employee status might mean conforming to the stereotypical expectations like tighter oversight and scheduled hours.

Once the law was enacted on January 1, 2019, companies will have no choice but to comply. This increases the risk of large-scale layoffs due to the higher costs of doing business.

Uber Lawsuit

Independent contractor vs. employee – that is indeed the question in the latest lawsuits hitting the ride-sharing giant. The proposed Uber class-action lawsuit filed by Uber driver Angela McRay was the first since the contentious AB5 Bill was signed into law. In the suit, McRay accuses the company of “misclassifying” its drivers as independent contractors effectively denying them the benefits of being employees.

uber lawsuit image

She is suing for damages on behalf of California Uber drivers and seeking an injunction against compliance with the new law. She further faults Uber for publicly stating that it intends to defy the new statute and would “continue to treat drivers as independent contractors.”

As independent contractors, they’re not entitled to any benefits like paid sick days, overtime, workers’ compensation, health insurance, or Social Security. And, if that wasn’t enough Uber insurance doesn’t protect drivers in certain situations when they’re driving for the ride-sharing company.

A driver would have to look into other insurance policies like commercial or gap insurance for better coverage. The long and the short of it is, drivers lament that this system continues to perpetuate their exploitation.

In response, Uber Chief Legal Officer clarified that the new law would not automatically reclassify existing drivers as employees but would instead make it more difficult to simply call them independent contractors. He, however, made it clear that they would work towards passing the ABC Test in California.

Supporters of the AB5 law say that it would benefit long-suffering contractors who would now be entitled to coverage under overtime and minimum wage laws. They would also have access to expense reimbursements as well as health insurance, Social Security, and other benefits. In March 2019, Uber agreed to pay a $20 million-dollar settlement in a driver classification lawsuit by California and Massachusetts drivers.

AB5 Implications Outside California

If you’re outside California and wondering whether the new AB5 law affects you, the answer is – probably. In recent years approximately 20 states have enacted the ABC Test in one form or another.

However, this is usually in workers’ compensation claims for unemployment insurance. California has the largest economy compared to any other US state. As a result, any political and legal developments that take place here tend to have a ripple effect across the country and at the federal level as well.

The passage of the Bill into law is likely to trigger a domino effect that will see similar bills pop up in other states. So, businesses operating outside California should use the law as a blueprint to streamline their business processes, and independent contractor relationships to avoid a deer in headlights situation.

Steps Businesses Can Take

If you run a company in California and your business model has independent contractors at its core, now’s as good a time as any to line your ducks in a row. Remember, the law comes into effect on January 1, 2020. Here are some steps you can take:

  1. Consult with an attorney whose specialty lies in employment and independent contractor law. You need to find someone who has a full grasp of all the various options for structuring the gig-worker relationship.
  2. Assess your risk by conducting an independent audit of your independent worker management processes. This includes analyzing the terms of engagement, contractual guidelines, rate negotiations, work structure and level of control, independent contractor incorporation requirements, etc.
  3. Leverage technology. This will help you not only minimize your risk but also provide guidance on and implement industry-specific best practices. It also acts as an intermediary between your business and the independent contractor to support a B2C model while providing the tools necessary for the contractors to establish themselves as a separate business.
  4. Establish an “arm’s length” business relationship with your independent contractors. If they meet the 12 requirements set out by law, then they’ll be exempt from the ABC Test.

Good or Bad – Depends on Who You Ask

The AB5 news on the enactment of the bill is a double-edged sword that cuts both ways. Experts predict that shifting a significant number of independent contractors to an employee workforce will see the costs of doing business in California begin to rise. These will likely be passed to the consumer.

bad good image

The AB5 law, however, spells good news for independent contractors if it means they also get to enjoy the perks of being regarded as employees but with the flexibility that comes with being a flexible worker. The court’s interpretation of the law is yet to be seen.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat now with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.

santa cruz boat fire featured image

Maritime Law Case Study: The Santa Cruz Boat Fire

Legal AssistantMaritime Law, Personal Injury Law Leave a Comment

34 people were pronounced dead after a fire ravaged a scuba dive boat off the California coast in the worst maritime disaster the state has ever seen. The 75-foot-long vessel that was christened Conception sank off Santa Cruz Island.

It had 33 passengers on board and one crew member who were all asleep when the fire broke out on the early morning of September 2, 2019. In such circumstances, wrongful death suits filed by the surviving family members of the boat fire victims against owners of sunken boats are almost always certain.

However, the Conception boat owners seek to invoke an 1851 maritime law that essentially shields them from any form of liability in the dive boat fire disaster. This is the same law that was invoked after the Titanic tragedy.

The California boat fire case brings to the forefront many questions about the applicability of a seemingly archaic maritime law to a modern-day disaster. The Santa Cruz boat fire forms the basis of this maritime law case study.

Level of Liability as Defined in Federal Maritime Law

If a fire broke out at an on-land facility and claimed 34 lives, the building owners would be held liable for those deaths. Such accidents would often result in the liable parties paying millions of dollars in wrongful death damages.

However, when an accident occurs in the ocean, maritime law kicks in, and the extent to which the boat owners bear the brunt of responsibility for the deaths is defined by the Limitation of Liability Act of 1851. It may seem odd that a law that a 168-year old law is still being used by maritime injury lawyers today but that is indeed the current state of affairs.

According to the statute, the owner of a vessel and its insurer can severely limit or, under certain conditions, escape entirely from any level of financial liability. This law applies to all accidents that occur on any waterway. So accidents involving barges, tugboats, and leisure boats are all covered under this law.

Four days after the Conception sank, Truth Aquatics Inc., the owner of the boat filed a petition in the US District Court in LA to invoke the statute. The law allows the owner of a vessel to request that a federal court limit the potential damages to an amount equal to the post-accident value of the boat, or exonerate them from damages altogether.

While most people find it quite bizarre that the owners filed suit so quickly and that the liability for the tragic loss of life in the boat fire could potentially amount to nothing, it is all perfectly within their legal rights. Truth Aquatics alleges that the Conception, which was burned down to the water line before sinking 60 feet deep in the ocean water, is now completely worthless, and they should, therefore, be exempted from liability in any potential boat fire lawsuit.

Maritime Law Was Invoked After Sinking of the Titanic

While this 1851 maritime law may seem financially motivated and morally abhorrent, it has been used by boat owners in the past to escape liability. Remember the infamous Titanic disaster of 1912?

titanic underwater image

More than 1,500 people lost their lives during the ship’s maiden voyage. White Star Lines – the owners of the Titanic – successfully invoked this law and were ordered to pay a measly $92,000 in damages. This was the cumulative value of the lifeboats that survived the calamity.

To successfully invoke this statute, a boat owner has to prove that their actions did not contribute to the accident or, as the 1851 law puts it, lacked “privity or knowledge” of the disaster. They prove this in three ways:

  • That the ship was properly equipped
  • That the crew was properly trained
  • That the leadership and crew members followed the correct procedures

The Titanic was touted for all the sophisticated technology it had that made it “unsinkable”. White Star Lines’ defense argument was that they had no role to play in the captain steering the ship into an iceberg.

Maritime Law as Applied to the Santa Cruz Boat Fire

Today, technology advancements in global communications have made it easier for boat crew members and owners to keep in touch while the vessel is out at sea. This was not possible 168 years ago so one can understand the spirit behind the maritime statute. It is now virtually impossible for captains, boat leadership and crew to make any decision without first consulting the owners for approval.

The judge hearing the case will be looking for evidence that points to the owners’ knowledge or some level of involvement in the accident. They’ll likely be looking at:

  • The crew’s background, education, and competency
  • If the equipment onboard was sufficient to quell the flames
  • The training of the crew and passengers

Truth Aquatics through their maritime lawyer alleges that the fire did not break out as a result of any negligence, knowledge or fault on their part. Invoking this law usually means that the owners will try to pass the blame onto a crew member.

Under maritime law, boat owners have a duty of care to both their crew and passengers. The standard owed to each category is what differs.

Duty of Care to Passengers

passengers on boat image

The boat owners are required to exercise “reasonable care under the circumstances” to safeguard the wellbeing of the passengers on board their vessels. This essentially means that owners are not strictly liable for any defects in the ship or its equipment. The burden of proof remains on showing that negligence played a significant role in causing the damages or injury.

Duty of Care to Crew Members

The crew members who were aboard the Conception are regarded as seamen as per the Jones Act. This federal statute which was established in 1920 and revised in 2006 exists to offer protection to maritime workers in a way that land-based laws do not. Here’s how.

If a land-based worker gets injured in their line of duty, they qualify for state-or federal-based workers’ compensation. This, however, doesn’t apply to maritime workers.

They can’t file for benefits or damages from their employer in the way that their land-based counterparts can. Jones Act helps seamen recover damages from injuries and accidents. Professions that classified as seamen include:

  • Captains
  • Pilots
  • Engineers
  • Fishermen
  • Divers
  • Deckhands
  • Drillers
  • Anchors
  • Mates
  • Bartenders
  • Stewards
  • Cooks

Essentially any individual who spends at least 30% of their time contributing to the work of a water-based vessel that frequents navigable waters is protected under this act. The owners’ duty of care to crew member gives their employees:

  • A right to receive “maintenance and cure” if they become ill or injured during their service on the boat. This is the equivalent of worker’s compensation.
  • A right to sue their employer for failing to fulfill a duty of reasonable care to make the vessel safe for the crew.
  • A right to sue their employer for failing to provide a vessel, crew, and equipment that are “reasonably fit” for their intended purposes. This means suing for “unseaworthiness”.

A successful suit against the owners means proving that the owners’ failed in fulfilling their duty of care to the crew. While the exact cause of the boat fire is unknown, some of the boat’s equipment may likely be implicated to show “unseaworthiness,” for instance, failure of the smoke alarms to sound in good time or failure of the power strip.

Damages Recoverable

If the disaster had occurred more than three nautical miles from the shore, claims from the passengers and surviving kin would have been governed by a different statute – Death on The High Seas Act. This would effectively limit their damage claims to economic losses.

sinking ship image

Compensation for emotional distress and pre-death pain experienced by the passengers cannot be sought. But since the accident occurred within California territorial waters, passengers and surviving next of kin can petition the state to supplement their damages.

Crew members and surviving kin can seek maintenance and cure as well as economic and non-economic damages. They can seek emotional distress, pain, and suffering damages if they can prove “unseaworthiness” or neglect as defined in the Jones Act.

Lawsuits Filed so Far

Christine Dignam, the widow of Justin Dignam, who died aboard the Conception, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Truth Aquatics Inc. She alleges that the vessel lacked adequate firefighting equipment, smoke detectors, and emergency exits.

She also claims that the vessel did not have a night watch on duty when the fire erupted. Dignam’s case is a counterclaim to the limitation of liability suit preemptively filed by the boat owners, which effectively puts on notice anyone who wants to contest the action giving them until July 1, 2020, to file.

According to the details of the suit, all six Conception crew members were asleep. This went against Coast Guard regulations that require a “roving” night watch. The suit also alludes to the fact that the boat’s electrical system was not safe given that passengers charged their battery-powered devices and equipment in the gallery above the sleeping-quarters.

Ryan Sims, a steward who survived the disaster, also filed a lawsuit against Truth Aquatics Inc. He claims that the owners failed to adequately train crew members on what to do in case of such an accident. He further alleges that they also failed to provide proper safety and medical equipment and safety rules. He seeks compensation for medical costs that resulted from his injuries, attorney fees, and punitive damages.

Seaman’s Manslaughter Statute

This statute criminalizes negligence, misconduct, or failure to perform prescribed duties aboard a vessel that results in the death of crew members. The three groups that are subject to criminal liability in such instances are:

  • The ship’s corporate management
  • Individuals charged with the responsibility of upholding the vessel’s condition
  • The vessel’s officers like captains, pilots, and engineers

Seaman’s manslaughter statute differs from common law manslaughter in that the former doesn’t require the accused party to prove unstable mental state or heat of passion. The threshold is much lower, requiring only simple negligence which could be an act or omission that violates the standard of care.

Notable Cases

cruise ship the bahamas image

The most recent attempt to apply this statute occurred in Louisiana following the Deepwater Horizon blowout on April 20, 2010, where 11 crew members died. This was, however, dismissed after the District Court established that the two BP engineers who were aboard the vessel at the time were not crew members nor were they in operational control of the vessel and could, therefore not be held responsible for the lives lost.

The 2003 Staten Island ferry crash case, however, had a different outcome. On that fateful day, the pilot, who was concealing his use of pain medication, claimed to have taken painkillers the night before to alleviate pain due to a bad back. He ended up passing out while at the helm of the ferry the following day causing a crash that killed 11 people while critically injuring several others. He pleaded guilty to 11 counts of seaman’s manslaughter and was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

On July 19, 2018, a duck boat accident claimed the lives of 17 people aged between 1 and 76 when it capsized amid gusts of wind blowing at 65 mph. The captain of the Missouri duck boat, along with two other employees of the company were charged with 17 counts of seaman’s manslaughter and could be facing up to 10 years in prison if convicted.

Some Final Thoughts

The Santa Cruz boat fire will likely trigger changes in Coast Guard safety regulations for overnight fishing boats and dive boats like the Conception. It is also likely to reignite the debate over the fairness and applicability of the 1851 Limitation of Liability Act.

The general discussion will center on whether it should be changed, updated, or repealed. This will ultimately depend on the media coverage of the Santa Cruz case during proceedings as well as its eventual outcome. For now, it is impossible to predict how things will go until the exact cause of the fire is determined.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat online with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.

military medical malpractice law featured image

Senate Passes Military Medical Malpractice Law

Legal AssistantMedical Malpractice, Personal Injury Law Leave a Comment

Until recently, active-duty military personnel could not bring military medical malpractice cases against army medical facilities or practitioners. Troops are barred from suing the US government for personal injury or fatality, as each is considered to be an “incident to service.”

So, even if the treatment they received was for an elective procedure, and the said procedure was done negligently, their hands were tied. This also applied to procedures performed away from the battlefield. The Senate passed a military medical malpractice law that changes all that.

Now, the $738 billion defense spending bill contains a provision known as the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act or NDAA for short that allows active-duty military officers to sue the federal government for malpractice when its medical practitioners act negligently. The bill was signed into law by President Donald Trump on December 20, 2019.

The Genesis of It All

35-year old Richard Stayskal was an Army Green Beret who was drawn to the military by his passion for wanting to serve his country in the only way he knew how. However, during a 2004 tour of duty in Iraq, a bullet tore through his body, piercing his chest and leaving behind scar tissue.

diagnostic centre image

He went about performing his duties until the opportunity to join the Special Forces dive school presented itself. It was something he always wanted to do, so he jumped at the chance to embark on the character-building journey.

So, in January 2017, Stayskal reported to the Womack Army Medical Center for mandatory tests to ensure that his 2004 injury wouldn’t compromise the underwater operations that he would now be heavily involved in. So, a chest scan was done, but doctors failed to inform him of the tumor in his right lung that measured more than an inch in diameter.

The Misdiagnosis

Four months later, he was rushed to the hospital in an ambulance after his condition deteriorated. He reported experiencing excruciating chest pains, trouble breathing and dizziness. When the army doctors took a closer look at the earlier scan, they noticed the tumor indicating that attention was needed, but still sent him home with a diagnosis of Atypical Pneumonia.

He was also given three prescriptions as well as a referral to an army pulmonologist for further evaluation. It was at this point that he received his first correct diagnosis: Stage 3 lung cancer. In the six months that he was on prescription medication for a wrong diagnosis, his cancer advanced rapidly and had nearly doubled in size at this point. Stayskal’s cancer is now terminal having advanced to stage 4.

electrocardiogram image

The Feres Doctrine

Although this was a clear cut case of gross military medical malpractice, there’s nothing Stayskal could do to hold the errant army doctors accountable for their actions. This was because of a controversial legal precedent that was set in the 1950s called the Feres Doctrine that prevented army troops from pursuing damages for on-duty accidents or war-related injuries.

For many years, the doctrine has prevented families with military medical malpractice claims from seeking redress in the legal system. The Department of Defense continued to defend its current “no-fault” system of compensation, arguing that it provided the fairest approach to all the different types of negligence claims – medical malpractice included.

Shortcomings of the Feres Doctrine

One of the major flaws with the original Feres v. United States litigation was that it integrated three negligence claims. Two of them involved surgery-related medical malpractice. In one of these, the military surgeon left behind a 30-by-18 inch towel that read Medical Department US Army.

The third involved the widow of an army lieutenant who filed a lawsuit after a defective heater caused a military barracks fire that led to the untimely death of her husband. The spirit of the doctrine was to protect frontline medics who have to make pressured judgment calls in the heat of battle.

But it was expanded to encompass all non-war scenarios in the military medical system, which is a major deviation from what the spirit of the law intended. There have been many unsuccessful attempts in the past to fix the doctrine via Congress with one notable one being the Military Medical Accountability Act of 2009.

x ray examine image

It was introduced in both the House and the Senate but was effectively shut down. Now, thanks to the NDAA, military service members can hold the federal government accountable for medical malpractice.

The National Defense Authorization Act

While the new legislation is in no doubt a game-changer, it does come with some significant limitations. For starters, military members will still not be able to sue for personal injuries caused by medical practitioners on the battlefield.

Their claims will also be resolved administratively, meaning that they will not be pursued in federal court. Additionally, a claim valued at less than $100,000 that has been substantiated will be paid by the Department of Defense directly to the service member or the surviving beneficiary of the deceased.

A claim that is valued more than $100,000 will be reviewed by the Secretary of Defense. If they give it the nod, the Treasury Department will pay it out.

Military personnel also have a two-year time limit from the date of injuries within which to file their claims. Therefore, victims who sustained injuries before 2017 will not be able to seek redress in 2020, no matter how egregious they were.

Perhaps the biggest shortcoming of the Act is that if the Department of Defense shoots down the claim, it marks the end of the road in the pursuit of justice. Not to mention the limited institutional experience the army has when it comes to handling medical malpractice suits.

Get Top-Notch Legal Representation

While the National Defense Authorization Act is far from perfect, it does open an avenue for aggrieved service members who have suffered an injury at the hands of negligent medical personnel to seek justice. If you are in the military or have served in the past, getting great legal representation will go a long way in getting you the outcome you deserve. Ensure that you get experienced lawyers for veterans as well as for active servicemen to help you hold negligent army doctors accountable for their actions.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat online with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.


pipeline explosion injuries featured image

Legal Options for Pipeline Explosion Injuries and Damages

Legal AssistantPersonal Injury Law Leave a Comment

A map of gas pipelines in the US reveals that the network spans over two million miles carrying gas into millions of homes and businesses. However, the number of pipeline explosion tragedies has been on the rise in the recent past due to aging, damage, or cracking brought on by erosion of the pipe walls over time.

Several local utility companies are yet to replace the old lines while, in other cases, the pipeline companies charged with operating these gas lines fail to properly monitor them which further increases the risk for injury. If a gas pipeline explosion resulted in severe injuries for you or caused the death of a loved one, this article explores the legal options available in the pursuit of explosion injuries and damages.

Explosion Accident Lawyer – Why You Need One

Anyone who’s been injured in a pipeline explosion should know that they were not responsible for the accident. Most people also understand that they are entitled to damages to go towards catering for the expenses and losses incurred as a result of the explosion.

However, the outcome of the entire ordeal all depends on whether or not victims retain the services of a personal injury law firm to handle their claims. Insurance companies for the pipeline companies who are considered the negligent parties, in this case, exist to compensate the victims in such circumstances. But, you need to remember whose interests they’ll be looking to protect, and it’s certainly not the victims.

Explosion accident attorneys are well versed in handling these types of claims and are capable of going toe to toe with insurance companies on your behalf. If you attempt to handle a claim on your own, you may not be aware of all the crafty tactics insurance representatives use to trick and trap you into reducing the value of your claim.

For instance, what may appear to be a casual conversation between an insurance company representative and a victim might result in recorded statements that downplay the severity of the injuries and how the injuries in question aren’t necessarily impacting their ability to function. In other instances, the insurer might get the victims to unwittingly accept blame for failing to take certain actions that could have minimized or avoided their injuries altogether.

If you talk to an insurance company representative on your own and end up making statements that could undervalue your claim, that’s it. That train has left the station. You won’t have any opportunity to retract your statements even if you believe they misinterpreted your remarks.

Independent Investigation

Aside from helping you circumvent any tricks, underhanded tactics, and traps the insurance companies may set, an experienced gas explosion lawyer provides the added benefit of an independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the accident. They can go to the accident scene as soon as possible and collect crucial evidence to determine the true cause of the explosion.

installing pipeline image

That way, they are better placed to identify all the potentially liable parties in your claim so that you don’t end up receiving the short end of the stick when suing all negligent parties responsible. Any check you receive from your insurance company represents a proposed settlement for your claim.

If you cash it, it means that you’ve accepted the settlement. This is usually written in fine print somewhere on the check. So, unless you’re satisfied with the amount on the table and its ability to cover past, present, and future expenses related to your injuries, it’s better to consult with a lawyer first. They are in a better position to determine whether or not you should accept the offer.

Legal Options for Pipeline Explosions

Replacing an aging or damaged pipeline can cost pipeline owners and operators well above $1 million per mile. With those kinds of figures, it’s easy to see why these companies would avoid replacing them if they didn’t have to.

If an explosion occurs and results in severe or even fatal injuries, there are various legal options available to hold the pipeline companies or operators responsible. Here are some examples of lawsuits you can pursue.

1. Failure to Properly Mark Pipeline Locations

Before embarking on any kind of excavation work, a specialist must be brought on board to map out any underground pipelines that may exist in the area of interest. That way, the safety of the people who will be digging in the area is safeguarded. If a contractor fails to do this, provides inaccurate or incomplete information, or the pipeline was never mapped in the first place, any injuries that result from an explosion are grounds to sue all negligent parties.

3. Pipeline Corrosion or Metal Fatigue

Over time, the risk of pipeline failure inevitably increases due to the extreme pressure that comes from oil and gas transportation. Owners and operators have the responsibility to continuously monitor the pipelines and ensure their integrity. If they fail to do this and a pipeline explosion occurs, causing severe or fatal injuries, these are grounds to sue all the responsible parties.

4. Poor Installation Practices

As the natural gas industry continues to thrive, new technology is developed to allow for the expansion of the pipeline to areas of the country that were previously inaccessible. As a result, more and more companies continue to set up shop there. As the rate of pipeline installation increases, the risk for potential errors that result from shoddy workmanship also rises.

welding oil pipeline image

Some contractors focus on the speed of installation rather than the quality and compliance to standards. If cutting corners results in an explosion further down the line and you’re injured as a result, then you have grounds to sue.

4. Inadequate Training and Safety Practices

Both state and federal governments have specific rules and regulations that stipulate the minimum safety practices and standards that oil and gas pipeline workers, operators, and owners have to adhere to. Pipeline companies are charged with the responsibility of implementing, training and enforcing these safety practices to keep both the workers and the general public protected from any potential mishaps.

A safety plan needs to include guidelines for preventing calamitous events and action plans detailing how to respond if an explosion were to occur. If a company’s inadequate training and safety practices contribute to a pipeline explosion and you sustain injuries; as a result, you have grounds to sue for compensation.

5. Defective Pipeline Parts

Oil and gas pipeline systems are always under extreme pressure. The integrity of the parts used to build these systems is therefore critical since even the smallest manufacturing defect can have catastrophic consequences. While proving this type of negligence can be an uphill battle, it is not impossible. A skilled pipeline explosion lawyer can sue the manufacturing company as well for their share of the responsibility in the explosion.

A Brief Overview of Past Pipeline Explosions

In the past decade, there have been dozens of pipeline explosions that have led to hundreds of injuries and fatalities. Here’s a snapshot of some of the major pipeline accidents that have occurred in recent years.

Pipeline Explosion Mexico

On January 18, 2019, a gas pipeline in Tlahuelilpan, a municipality located roughly 70 miles north of Mexico City, exploded due to illegal taps installed by thieves. 85 people died as a result, with 58 others critically injured and hospitalized. In such instances, the pipeline company cannot be held liable for such an explosion as it was the direct result of illegal activities that had nothing to do with them.

Enbridge Pipeline Explosion

On the afternoon of November 28, 2007, an oil pipeline exploded near Clearbrook, Minnesota, killing two men. In August 2019, another gas pipeline explosion in Kentucky killed one person and injured six others. Enbridge, a Canadian multinational company, was put to task over their role in the two explosions since they own both pipelines.

The cause of the Kentucky explosion has been attributed to a rupture in the pipeline. The family of a woman who was killed in the August explosion is now suing the pipeline company for negligence citing the following:

  • Failure to properly train the pipeline workers and other employees
  • Failure to adequately inspect, maintain and monitor the gas pipeline
  • Failure to adequately monitor gas flow and take the necessary corrective action
  • Failure to provide proper warnings of hazards
  • Failure to warn the deceased and other affected individuals of potentially high hazardous conditions
  • Failure to remedy or correct the existing hazardous situation

According to details of the suit, the family is seeking more than $1 million in compensatory damages and also names Spectra Energy Corporation and Spectra Energy Transmission Services in the suit. Enbridge and Spectra merged two years earlier.

pipeline valve image

Midland Pipeline Explosion

In August 2018, a gas explosion occurred at the intersection of two pipelines owned by El Paso Natural Gas and operated by Kinder Morgan and Navitas Midstream in Midland, Texas. One fatality resulted from the catastrophe, and six people were left nursing severe injuries. The explosion was attributed to an underground gas leak on the pipeline, at which point it caught fire and exploded.

Dixie Pipeline Explosion

In November 2007, two people were killed, and seven others sustained severe injuries when a Dixie propane gas pipeline exploded in Carmichael Clarke County in the state of Mississippi.

Pipeline Explosion in Louisiana

In February 2017, a pipeline exploded at the Paradis Phillips 66 Station in Louisiana, where one person was killed, and two others were severely injured. The explosion was suspected to be due to a valve or gasket failure.

Pipeline Explosion – Damages Available to Injured Parties

If you are a victim of a pipeline explosion or you’ve lost a loved one as a result of this disastrous event, it is possible to file a claim to recover damages. While the compensation you receive will not undo what has already happened, it will go a long way in helping you along your road to recovery.

You also need to be mindful of your state’s statute of limitations for explosion-related claims. In cases where the explosion resulted in a fatality, there are only a handful of people who can file a suit against the negligent parties in the incident.

These include the surviving spouse of the deceased, surviving children, or the parents. If none of these parties file the claim within three months of the death, the executor of the deceased’s estate can file it on their behalf.

There are typically three types of pipeline explosion injury damages available to the injured parties or the deceased’s next of kin.

1. Compensatory Damages

This refers to the money awarded to the injured parties to restore all financial losses incurred as a result of the explosion. It goes towards footing medical expenses and/or funeral costs.

If the victim is unable to work after the accident, economic damages may be awarded to cater for the loss of wages or future earning capacity as well as the loss or destruction of private property.

2. Psychological Damages

This refers to the money awarded due to the emotional distress the victim has experienced as a result of the pipeline accident. In a wrongful death claim, the surviving next of kin can also sue for damages for the mental and emotional anguish they’re experiencing due to the death of their loved one.

3. Punitive Damages

Punitive or exemplary damages as they are sometimes called are awarded in instances where gross negligence caused the explosion. They are aimed at punishing the defendants for what happened and to serve as an example to other pipeline companies and operators to deter them from committing the same atrocities.

Get Legal Representation for a Fair Compensation

An oil or gas pipeline explosion can be devastating to the injured parties, property, and even the environment. Think about the thousands of gallons of oil or gasoline that get released into rivers, lakes, and marshland when a pipeline ruptures. This contamination leads to the destruction of plants and wildlife. If your property was affected as a result of the spillage, you might no longer be able to continue living there.

Regardless of how a pipeline explosion affects you, it is only fair that you are compensated for your losses, and all liable parties are held accountable for their negligent actions. Consult a competent pipeline explosion lawyer to explore all the available legal options to see to it that you get what you deserve.

If you have more legal questions, you can also chat online with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.


vaping injuries

Vaping Injuries – Who’s Liable?

Legal AssistantMass Torts, Personal Injury Law Leave a Comment

Vaping has, in recent times, been touted as a safe alternative to smoking traditional cigarettes. This perception has seen a large number of young people take up e-cigarette smoking despite never having smoked in their lives.

In fact, companies like JUUL with their JUUL vape have historically been known to target children and teenagers with their products. This begs the question: Is vaping bad for you? Well, the answer to this is a resounding yes!

E-cigarettes have been linked to hundreds of serious lung injury cases that result in death. According to data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), thousands of cases of lung injury have been reported in people who have a history of using e-cigarettes or vaping.

If you or someone you know has suffered lung injury as a result, can you seek legal redress? If so, from whom? This article seeks to demystify the parties liable for vaping injuries.

What Is In Vape Juice?

E-liquid, e-juice, or vape juice, as it is sometimes called, is the fluid contained in e-cigarettes or vaporizers to create vapor. It comes in various flavors and nicotine levels, with some brands offering zero-nicotine alternatives.

vape juice

It is made of water, flavoring additives, vegetable glycerin, and propylene glycol. Others may contain CBD vape oil, THC vape oil, or essential oil vape specifically designed for vaporizers.

The mechanism of action is pretty straightforward. The vape pen or vaporizer heats up the vape juice to between 200 and 400 degrees Fahrenheit, effectively turning the liquid into vapor, which is then inhaled.

Vaping products continue to advance from the common vape pens and e-cigarettes to the newer vape mod kits, which are marketed to more “experienced” individuals looking to experience something different. Sadly, what they fail to mention is the added risk for lung disease they bear.

What Causes Vaping-Related Lung Injuries and Deaths

The scientific community is still largely unsure of the exact mechanism by which vaping causes lung injuries and eventual death. Research from the University of Utah suggests that it could be due to a type of lipoid pneumonia that results from lipids (fat molecules) entering the lungs.

human lungs

There is also the presence of Vitamin E acetate present in vape juice that has been known to cause chronic inflammation of the respiratory system, lung disease, acquired respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and in some instances, death.

Anytime an individual inhales vaping liquid, they are essentially exposing their lungs to dangerous substances that are responsible for causing lung injuries. These injuries may include:

  • Bronchial pneumonia
  • Bleeding in the lungs
  • Fluid in the lungs
  • Collapsed lung
  • Lung infection
  • Lung failure
  • Pneumonia
  • Popcorn lung
vitamin e capsules

The CDC is buried elbow deep in research in an effort to decipher the devastating effects of vaping and minimize the number of vaping-related deaths.

Diacetyl and Popcorn Lung: The link

Diacetyl is the chemical used in certain foods like microwaveable popcorn to give them their characteristic “buttery” flavor. This compound is, however quite dangerous as is had been linked to causing popcorn lung.

The condition was christened popcorn lung after factory employees who worked at a factory that used to manufacture microwaveable popcorn developed bronchiolitis obliterans or popcorn lung as it is commonly referred to as. The condition gives rise to a number of complications like lung inflammation, permanent scarring, breathing difficulty, and irreversible lung damage.

Diacetyl in vape juice, which is essentially the same substance as the infamous popcorn lung chemical, is used by vape manufacturers as a flavor additive in e-liquids. Because of the possible health risks associated with the chemical, its use in the manufacture of e-liquids has been banned in Europe.

Filing a Vaping Injury Lawsuit

While vaping is dangerous for everyone who uses vaping products, children and teens are at a greater risk of suffering from vaping injuries. Nevertheless, if you or someone you know is suffering from lung injuries that are the result of vaping, you can seek legal redress to help cater for the lifetime of medical expenses you’ll incur.

vaping injury lawsuit

You can also sue the vaping company for damages resulting from the reduced quality of life you’ll now be facing.

Whether your lung injuries stem from JUUL or any other e-cigarette company, you can hold them liable for the devastating blow their products have rendered to your health. Some of the compensation types you can pursue include:

  • Payment for current and recurrent medical expenses such as costs associated with MRI scans, X-rays, visits to the doctor, hospital stays, surgeries, medications, therapies, etc.
  • Recovering lost wages resulting from vaping-related lung injuries
  • Damages for the reduction of future earning capacity
  • Compensation for all medical expenses that you are likely to incur in the future
  • Pain and suffering compensation resulting from having to deal with the reduced quality of life you have to adjust to

Suing for Vaping Injury Damages: Steps You Need to Take

If you are diagnosed with lung damage resulting from vaping, you need to consult with a lawyer who will help you take the appropriate course of action to protect your legal rights to ensure that you hold the company responsible for their negligent actions. Some of the steps you need to take include:

  • Create a file that contains all the medical records and documents that detail your diagnosis and treatment plan
  • Keep a record of all your medical bills and expenses
  • Document any time you miss work due to issues related to your injuries
  • Outline when you started vaping, the product you were using at the time, and when you started to exhibit symptoms related to your illness

Hold the Vaping Company Accountable

Bear in mind that there’s a time limit within which you need to file a lawsuit once you are diagnosed with vaping-related lung injury. It is, therefore, important to get in touch with a vaping injury attorney as soon as possible to hold the company accountable for causing your injuries. You shouldn’t have to pay for the harm caused by a dangerous product.

If you have more legal questions, you can comment below or chat online with a Laws101.com attorney, where you’ll be instantly connected to a lawyer who can give you legal guidance on your specific case or question.